Legal Opinion

Pieraccini v. Crenshaw

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

In this case the respondent, Prances Crenshaw, brought suit for negligence against the petitioners for injuries *329sustained as a result of falling while on the premises of the petitioners.

At the close of respondent’s proof a directed verdict was given in favor of the petitioners. The Court of Appeals reversed and held that the case should have been submitted to the jury. We granted certiorari.

The case presents this situation: The petitioners operate a skating rink and in so doing provided a w;aste receptacle up against the wall in the lobby between the entrance and the skating area, and it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Reay v. Reorganization Inv. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Legler v. Kennington-Saenger Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  4. Cigan v. Arcadia Garden Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Thomas J. Obert EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Wagner v. Thomas J. Obert EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API