Legal Opinion

In re Kim K.

New York City Family Court

Decided February 28, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harvey M. Sklaver, J.

This matter is before the court on the Law Guardian’s *691motion for an order directing that the 13-year-old subject child, Kim K., not be called as a witness at the fact-finding hearing.

Counsel for the Department of Social Services had previously informed the court that he intended to offer into evidence prior out-of-court statements that the child Kim had made to caseworkers and others. Counsel for the respondent grandmother, Helen B., who is Kim’s legal guardian, objected on the ground that Kim is sufficiently mature and intelligent to give testimony…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In re Nicole V.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Lincoln v. LincolnNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. In re Christina F.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. In re Tara H.New York City Family Court · 1985
  5. In re Fawn S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Justin CC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re Randy A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Dominick C. v. Rosina C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API