Legal Opinion

Hagar v. Haas

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1903No. 12,065PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Jackson district court; Marshall Gephart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, 0. J. :

This was an action of replevin to recover corn grown upon the premises of D. H. Hagar. On June 27, 1899, Philip Haas, under-sheriff of Jackson county, attempted to levy an attachment on the growing corn as the property of D. H. Hagar. He went through the form of making an appraisement and declaring a levy on the corn, but, did not take possession or control of it, nor exercise any dominion over it, until about the 14th of November of that year. *334On August 9, 1899, D. H. Hagar, who was then in possession of the corn, sold and delivered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ford v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. McKinney v. PurcellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Dodson v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Wessels v. Weiss Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Crump v. StarkeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1861

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowman v. HazenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Steele v. CurrieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API