Legal Opinion

Alivecor, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 18, 2022No. 4:21-cv-03958Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALIVECOR, INC., Case No. 21-cv-03958-JSW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 v. LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DENYING 10 APPLE INC., MOTIONS TO SEAL Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 84, 94, 98 11 12 13 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion for leave to file first amended 14 complaint (“FAC”) filed by Plaintiff AliveCor, Inc. (“AliveCor”). The Court has considered the 15 parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, and it finds this matter suitable 16 for disposition…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'NCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API