Coney v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in failing to hold a proper Faretta 1 inquiry prior to permitting appellant to represent himself at trial. We find that the trial court conducted an adequate Faretta inquiry prior to the commencement of trial and affirm appellant’s conviction. However, we must remand this case for resentencing, as the trial court did not renew the offer of assistance of counsel to appellant prior to sentencing. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.111(d)(5); Monte v. State, 51 So.3d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). We affirm appellant’s conviction in all other…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Monte v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
3Cited by1 opinion
- Coney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011