Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex parte CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 27, 2016No. 1150355Published

1DissentMurdock, Justice

I respectfully dissent. See my dissent in Ex parte Courtyard Citiflats, LLC, 191 So.3d 787, 798 (Ala.2015), reasoning, inter alia, as follows:

“It appears then that the Court [in De-Gas, Inc. v. Midland Resources, 470 So.2d 1218 (Ala.1985),] was intending to describe simply the requirement that, if a filing fee is not paid with the complaint, the plaintiff must file an affidavit that, ultimately, meets with the approval of the court.
“The main opinion’s understanding of [certain language in De-Gas ] as requiring that the affidavit of substantial hardship be approved at some point before the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De-Gas, Inc. v. Midland ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Alvarado v. Estate of KiddSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  3. Arrington v. Courtyard Citiflats, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
  4. Marvin v. Health Care Authority for Baptist HealthSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API