Legal Opinion

Conard v. Moreland

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 17, 1941No. 45447PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStiger, J.

Defendant, Brady Transfer & Storage Company, the insured under the policy issued by defendant insurance company, had no interest in the tractor at the time of the trial and is not a party to this appeal.

An endorsement was attached to the policy covering the tractor against damage by collision which acknowledged that Moreland owned the .tractor and was the insured under the rider. The endorsement contained the following statement:

“Subject to all the provisions, exclusions, conditions and warranties contained in this poliey, loss, if any, payable, as interest may appear, to Assured [Moreland]…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois Automobile Insurance Exchange v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Chandos v. American Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Illinois Central Ry. v. HicklinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Packham v. German Fire Ins., Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  5. Collinsville Savings Society v. Boston InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  2. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. v. HeikenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Jerry Maiatico v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  4. Semo Motor Co. v. National Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Rogers v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API