Legal Opinion

In re Cohen

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 15, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

At the first meeting of creditors, sundry claims were presented for proof, and all those presented by parties now appealing from the decision of the referee were there contested. In view of all these circumstances, more fully set out in his certificate, that officer found it impracticable at that meeting to pass upon the validity of the claims there presented, and continued their consideration. See section 57d, Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 560 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3443]. As it thus became impossible to proceed to the election of a trustee in the ordinary…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Syracuse Paper & Pulp Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1908
  2. In re GoldsteinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1912
  3. In re KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. Atlantic Nat. Bank v. HanfligCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API