Legal Opinion

Paltsios's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 10, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.

The principal question in this case is whether *357the employee is entitled to double compensation under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 152, § 28, as appearing in St. 1943, c. 529, § 9, for an injury sustained on Saturday, September 22, 1945, when he was over sixteen but under eighteen years of age, by getting his hand caught in a meat grinding machine which he was operating at the provision store of the employer. Loss of the hand resulted.

This section reads as follows: “If the employee is injured by reason of the serious and wilful misconduct of an employer or of any person regularly intrusted with and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. McWhirterSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Purtell v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  4. West's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Commonwealth v. Hamilton Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paltsios's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  2. Boardman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API