Legal Opinion

Call v. Wharton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 15, 1942No. 4-6788PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Appellants, C. K. Call, Jr., and others, resident landowners in Oak Forest Subdivision, adjacent to the city of Little Rock, Arkansas, proceeding under the provisions of §§ 9495-9496 of Pope’s Digest, filed petition in the Pulaski county court for annexation of the property described in their petition. Appellees, A. F. Wharton and others, answered the petition protesting annexation. Upon a hearing, the county court granted the petition and ordered annexation.

Appellees then filed petition in the Pulaski circuit court,-third division, for review of the county court’s action and sought to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berry v. SaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Berry v. Cousart Bayou Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Miller v. Yell and Pope Bridge DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cook v. BevillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  2. Cantrell v. VaughnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. Boillot v. RatliffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Forsgren v. GilliozDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
  5. Marion County Rural School District No. 1 v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API