Legal Opinion

Janik v. Janik

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1985No. 3-984A250PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Chester Janik appeals from judgment of the Newton Cireuit Court. The operative facts of this case are not in dispute, and the following facts were established by stipulation of the parties at the trial level:

1. The marriage of Chester and Margaret Janik was dissolved on May 29, 1969. They were each awarded a one-half interest as tenants-in-common of the family residence and the lot on which it is located.

2. Margaret was awarded the exclusive right to possession of the real estate until the emancipation of the parties' last child, which occurred on June 1, 1978.

3. Under the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peden v. CavinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Geisendorff v. CobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Alleman v. HawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Hosanna v. OdishooIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Porter v. MooneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willett v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Hay v. HayIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Denton v. LazenbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API