Columbian Rope Co. v. Rinek Cordage Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant, a creditor, contends that the lower court erred in denying its claim against Jerome Brose, the former president of a debtor corporation, and against Rinek Rope Co. [Rope], which received the debtor’s remaining assets in a bulk transfer. We find the claim against Brose was properly denied. However, because the bulk transfer to Rope was “concealed” within the meaning of 13 Pa.C.S.A. § 6111, the six-month statute of limitations did not begin running until appellant discovered the bulk transfer. Ac*588cordingly, we reverse the lower court’s order dismissing appellant’s claim…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Butler v. KemmererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Fahringer v. Strine EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Aluminum Shapes, Inc. v. KA-LIQUIDATING COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Potter v. Leitenberger Machine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Bobby J. McKissick v. Foremost-Mckesson, Inc., D/B/A McKesson and Robbins Drug Co., PlaintiffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ingrassia Const. Co., Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- O'KEEFE v. GrenkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Beaver Valley Alloy Foundry, Co. v. Therma-Fab, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- SVM INVESTMENTS v. Mexican Exporters, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
- Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.