Legal Opinion

Columbian Rope Co. v. Rinek Cordage Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 1983No. 2854PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant, a creditor, contends that the lower court erred in denying its claim against Jerome Brose, the former president of a debtor corporation, and against Rinek Rope Co. [Rope], which received the debtor’s remaining assets in a bulk transfer. We find the claim against Brose was properly denied. However, because the bulk transfer to Rope was “concealed” within the meaning of 13 Pa.C.S.A. § 6111, the six-month statute of limitations did not begin running until appellant discovered the bulk transfer. Ac*588cordingly, we reverse the lower court’s order dismissing appellant’s claim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Butler v. KemmererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Fahringer v. Strine EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Aluminum Shapes, Inc. v. KA-LIQUIDATING COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Potter v. Leitenberger Machine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Bobby J. McKissick v. Foremost-Mckesson, Inc., D/B/A McKesson and Robbins Drug Co., PlaintiffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ingrassia Const. Co., Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. O'KEEFE v. GrenkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Beaver Valley Alloy Foundry, Co. v. Therma-Fab, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. SVM INVESTMENTS v. Mexican Exporters, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
  5. Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API