Bastida v. Batchelor

JORGENSON, Judge.

S. E. Bastida, plaintiff below, appeals from a directed verdict rendered in favor of defendants, George E. Batchelor and Alfredo Zanatti, at the close of plaintiff’s case. We fail to see that the basis as stated by the trial court, i.e., the absence of an indispensable party, is controlling, and reverse.

Bastida sold shares in Aeronaves del Peru, S. A. to appellees.1 The purchase price was to be paid in set installments and, in the event of default, the shares were to be returned.

Independent of and subsequent to the foregoing transaction, appellee George E. Batchelor made a…