Legal Opinion
Riverkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 14, 2014No. 3:13-CV-1494-PKPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAPAK, United States Magistrate Judge:
Plaintiff Columbia Riverkeeper (“CRK”) filed this action against defendant the United States Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) and Lt. Gen. Thomas P. Bostick on August 26, 2013. On September 26, 2013, CRK amended its complaint to state a claim under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) against the Corps only. By and through its FOIA claim, CRK challenges the Corps’ decision to withhold purportedly exempt materials otherwise responsive to CRK’s FOIA request for documents relating to the Corps’ environmental review in connection with…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Berryhill v. Bonneville Power AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- Berryhill v. Bonneville Power AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Contreraz v. City of TacomaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Husch Blackwell LLP v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020