Legal Opinion

Cruse v. Axtell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1875PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

This was an action by the appellants against the appellees, to recover the possession of real estate, a particular description of which is given in the complaint. The issue formed by the general denial was submitted to the court for trial, upon an agreed statement of facts, and resulted in a finding and judgment for the appellees.

The appellants have .assigned for error the overruling of their motion for a new trial.

The agreed statement of facts was as follows:

“For the purposes of the trial of the above cause, it is admitted by the plaintiffs and defendants :
“ 1. That Joseph W. Cruse died on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Water Works Co. v. BurkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Grimes' Executors v. HarmonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. King v. WoodhullNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  4. Barclay v. BreckinridgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
  5. Wright v. Trustees of Corp. of Meth. Epis ChurchNew York Court of Chancery · 1839

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dodge v. KinzyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. Elston Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Craig v. SecristIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Carver v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Dykeman v. JenkinesIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API