Legal Opinion

Blanco v. Wormuth

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 27, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2022-1883Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID A. BLANCO, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 22-1883 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 22, 30 : CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES I. INTRODUCTION David Blanco filed suit against Christine Wormuth, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Army (“the Army”), claiming that the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”) violated the Administrative Procedure Act…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  5. Dennis A. Dickson v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API