Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Crotty
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Sherwin-Williams Company and National Paint and Coatings Associa tion, Inc. (“plaintiffs”) sued Erin Crotty (“Crotty”) and Eliot- Spitzer (collectively “defendants”), for violating the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q); Commerce Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution (U.S. Const, art. 1, § 8, cl. 3; U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1), under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and various state law claims. Specifically, plaintiffs contest defendants’ creation and implementation of the Architectural and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Ass'n v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- Roberts v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012