Legal Opinion

Trinity County Lumber Co. v. Pinckard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 12, 1893No. 294PublishedCited by 14 opinions

2. Findings of Fact by Court. — It has long been the rule of appellate courts of this State, not to reverse a finding upon an issue of fact, whether the finding be that of a jury or of the court, unless it is unsupported by the evidence. Tried below before Hon. Norman G-. Kittrell.

1Opinion of the Court

PLEASANTS, Associate Justice.

The appellees, the heirs of William M. Pinckard, and Claiborne Steele, brought this suit on the 1st day of June, 1891, in the District Court of Trinity County, against the appellant, a private corporation, organized under the laws of Iowa, and L. T. Sloan, for the recovery of a league of land, granted by the government of Coahuila and Texas, on the 6th day of October, A. D. 1835, to John Johnson. •

Defendants, for answer, pleaded the general denial and the statute of limitation of three, five, and ten years; and to the statute of limitation, plaintiffs, by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Watrous v. McGrewTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Hancock v. McKinneyTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Link v. PageTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Mooring & Lyon v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Martin v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1862

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Loomis v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. NilesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. McCarthyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Montgomery v. TrueheartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Bibby v. BibbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API