Legal Opinion
Arcuri v. Leighty
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1977PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John H. Pennock, J.
This is a motion by the defendants for summary judgment (CPLR 3212) upon the grounds that there are no triable issues of fact, and that there is no merit to the causes of action asserted in the complaint; and/or alternatively for a partial summary judgment (CPLR 3212, subd [e]) dismissing all causes of action in the complaint except such causes of action as are pleaded alleging a cause of action for breach of duty of fair representation pursuant to the Railway Labor Act (US Code, tit 45, § 151 et seq.); and limiting the trial to such cause of action…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ballin v. LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1971