Patchell v. Groom
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Concurrence
I concur in the result, viz., that descendants of living ancestors do not share in distribution among "all of my descendants then living per stirpes and not per capita." but I do not agree that the grandchildren of the testator constitute the stirpes or stocks of descent, in this case.
The majority opinion construes "equally among all of my descendants then living per stirpes and not per capita" as meaning "equally among my grandchildren then living per capita and the then living descendants of deceased grandchildren perstirpes." As the only grandchildren are two children of a son and two of a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Slingluff v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- In Re the Will of SamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Levering v. OrrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- Lycett v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Mazziotte v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.