Legal Opinion

State v. Duff

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 1981No. 80-9-343, CA A20244PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals the sentence imposed by the trial court after defendant’s guilty plea to sodomy in the first degree, contending that the term of incarceration with a minimum of seven years constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, and that the trial court was without authority to impose restitution as a condition of defendant’s future parole. We consider only the second contention.

The sentencing order insofar as relevant, reads:

"THE COURT RECOMMENDS, upon release on parole, a condition of parole be reimbursement to Clackamas County for extradition costs in the amount of $902.45.”

Although it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. O'KEEFECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. State v. KippCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. State v. CaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API