Legal Opinion

People ex rel. American Thread Co. v. Feitner

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to quash a writ of certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.

The relator having been assessed by the respondents for purposes of taxation for the year 1899 has sued out a writ *642of certiorari to review the action of the board on the ground that the latter had no jurisdiction to make the assessment because the relator is a foreign corporation, neither doing business in the State nor having any property therein. A motion is now made by the respondents to quash the writ on the ground, as stated in the notice of motion-, “ that the court was without jurisdiction to issue said writ, and that the said writ was inadvertently issued.” It is admitted for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of CorwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. People ex rel. Rendrock Powder Co. v. FeitnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. People Ex Rel. West Shore Railroad v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Paddock v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Kendall v. FeitnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. People ex rel. New York Edison Co. v. FeitnerNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  3. People ex rel. Dufour v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. People ex rel. Dufour v. WellsNew York Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API