Legal Opinion

Matter of Lansner v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to respondents’ contention, the proceeding to validate petitioners’ designations as County Committeepersons was not brought by Lansner in a representative capacity. Rather, it was commenced by the candidates in their individual capacities as petitioners. Moreover, the petition was properly verified solely by Lansner since, in this case, the petitioners were "united in interest” (CPLR 3020 [d]; see, Matter of Castillo v Maclara, 63 NY2d 682, 683). Respondents’ remaining arguments are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Castillo v. MaclaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bonnett v. MinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Collins v. MarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Notholt v. Nassau County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Notholt v. Nassau County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API