Legal Opinion

President of the Bank of Pennsylvania v. Lassel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1798PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Summons debt 4500 dollars, returnable this term. A capias had issued against the principal to the last March term, on Avhich the sheriff returned a bail bond; which from some circumstances had not been sued to the last September term.

1Opinion of the Court

Per M’Kean, C. J. and Yeates, J.

The general rule here, as in England, is never to make a bail bond stand as a security, where the plaintiff can be put in as good a condition, as if he had never been delayed. Cowp. 71. The raging of the yellow fever at the last term, induced the court to direct, that on judgments then entered, the eessets should be prolonged from sixty days to the first day of the present term. Consequently no execution could have issued earlier than this term, if the bail had been duly entered. The defendant possessed no lands which might have been bound by a judgment at the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. M'Farland v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1819

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API