Legal Opinion

Christofely v. Federal Insurance Administration, Department of Housing & Urban Development

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 7, 1984No. CV 80-3400PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEXLER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs1 bring this action for payment under three residential insurance policies issued under the Federal Crime Insurance Program. Plaintiffs filed claims for losses suffered in a December 13, 1978 burglary of their adjoining dwellings. Payment on the policies was refused after investigations suggested there were elements of fraud in the claims.

Defendants now move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b), Fed.R. Civ.P. They allege that the required notice to the local police was not made by plaintiffs Martinez and McKenna and a signed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Dimitrious J. Lignos and Evelyn Lignos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. Meister Bros., Inc. v. John W. MacY Jr., Director of Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Dempsey v. Director, Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1982
  5. Nyasco Sports, Inc. v. Director, Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fine Wear Manufacturing Co. v. GiuffridaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API