Legal Opinion

Hemphill v. . Morrison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

There was verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appealed. The essential facts are stated in the opinion of Associate Justice Clark. There is no exception set out in the case on appeal other than "To the whole of this charge the plaintiff excepted." It does not affirmatively appear that there was not more than one proposition of law laid down in the charge, and this exception by the repeatedly repeated rulings of this Court, cannot be considered (Hopkins v. Bowers, 111 N.C. 175; S. v.Frizell, ib., 722), and there being no error apparent on the face of the record proper, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lowe v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Hopkins v. . BowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Hahn v. Brinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. State Ex Rel. Pipkin v. McArtanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Pipkin v. McArtanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API