Legal Opinion

Scheffler v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 5, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Soper, C. J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtConstable, J.

The only question involved in this appeal is the right of the trial Court to order a physical examination by a physician of its own selection, to be made of a party suing to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been inflicted by the defendant to the action.

The appellant brought an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the result of an alleged assault by the appellee, a minor. The appellee filed a petition, alleging that, although he had requested the appellant to submit herself to an examination, so that the nature, extent and permanency of the injuries for which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. United Railways & Electric Co. v. ClomanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Purdum v. LillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Brown v. Hutzler Bros. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Newcomer v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  4. Watson v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  5. Greenhow v. Whitehead's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API