Legal Opinion

De Monco v. Means

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 4, 1909No. 6186PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Denver County Court — Hon. Charles McCall, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

Upon September 11, 1905, the appellant filed, in the county court of the city and county of Denver, his claim ¿gainst the estate of George E. Eoss-Lewin, deceased, which estate was in the hands of the appellee 'as administrator. The items of the claim were as follows':

*458"1902

Sept. To services as clay expert in demonstrating Fire Pnlp Plaster in Denver...............$ 300.00

Nov. 5 to To services at Kansas City, Mo., and St. Lonis, Mo., in

Jan. 13, 1903. preparing and demonstrating Fire Pulp Plaster........... 1,125.00 To expenses................ 420.00 To contingent profits........ 1,750.00

Total..…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Charles v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  2. Thompson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  3. Clarke v. Estate of RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  4. Beaton v. WadeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MoilanenArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Parker v. HilliardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  3. Hathaway v. BottenfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Nelson v. BruceIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Lavelle v. BirnbaumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API