Legal Opinion

Hanson v. National Surety Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The plaintiffs are a firm of stockbrokers and dealers in securities. They intrusted certificates of stock to a messenger for delivery to Bar an & Co., Inc., at its office and place of business, 51 Beaver street, New York city. The messenger delivered the certificates, but upon the condition, evidenced by a written receipt, that title to the certificates should remain in the plaintiffs until payment should have been made therefor. Promptly upon receipt of the stock, Baran & Co., Inc., abandoned its office and its officers absconded with the certifi-* cates of stock. The plaintiffs have brought…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Underwood v. Globe Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. People v. NoblettNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Commonwealth v. LannanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Commonwealth v. RubinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lily Transportation Corp. v. Royal Institutional Services, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  2. Sutro Bros. & Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Sutro Bros. & Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. Fuller v. Home Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. People v. KaminskyNew York Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API