Legal Opinion

Pritchett v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 7, 2012No. 1100465PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Justice.

While represented by counsel, Stanford Earl Pritchett pleaded guilty to murder. Thereafter, Pritchett filed a pro se motion to set aside his guilty plea, asserting ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The trial court denied Pritchett’s motion without conducting a hearing and without making a determination that Pritchett had validly waived his right to counsel with respect to the motion.

The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court’s order denying Pritchett’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Pritchett petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari as to that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Trimble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  2. Waters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  3. Frost v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  4. Kirksey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  5. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API