Legal Opinion
Casey v. Tieman
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Eli Wager, J.
May a board of education be compelled to provide legal representation for a teacher who is joined as an additional respondent in a proceeding brought by another teacher who claims the right to his position? That is the issue raised in this CPLR article 78 proceeding by petitioner Thomas Casey who is a respondent, together with the Board of Education of the Syosset Central School District and its superintendent, in a proceeding brought by one Mary Collins who claims that she should have been appointed to the position he occupies at the Syosset High School.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Weimer v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Dreyfuss v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- McNulty v. City School District of BinghamtonNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Weimer v. Board of Education of Smithtown Central School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by1 opinion
- Casey v. TiemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985