State v. Burke

Askren, J.,

Appellants, having been convicted of the crime of being jointists, present four grounds of error on appeal.

It is first contended that, since the place where the liquor was sold was the home of the defendants, it was not a place maintained for the purpose of sale of intoxicating liquor. Our decisions in State v. Rohde, 140 Wash. 47, 248 Pac. 76, answer this contention. We there held that the statute was directed against the keeping of “any place” for the sale of liquors, and that the home of a defendant was included within the purview of the statute.

Next, it is urged that there was…