Legal Opinion

In re Mead

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1922No. Docket No. 73PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Certiorari to review proceedings in which Jesse Mead, a police officer, was adjudged guilty of contempt of recorder’s court of Detroit. Certain persons were taken into custody about 8 o’clock p. m. *481February 8, 1922, by the police department of that city. They were held at a station of which Mead was in, charge at the time in question. No formal charge or complaint had been made against them or any of them. The minutes at the station showed that each of them was held for the reasons: “disorderly ;person, gaming, investigation.” About 11 o’clock that evening, on behalf of such persons, Judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Linnen v. BanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. In re HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. In re of MortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Clink v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Townsend v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HimmeleinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Town & Country Motors, Inc. v. Local Union No. 328Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Sanders v. Evening News Assn.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. AlmashyMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. People v. HernandezMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API