Legal Opinion

Crane v. Crane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 4, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for specific performance of an oral agreement, the theory of which states a cause of action to impress a constructive trust, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated January 14, 1980, which denied his motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint for untimeliness was properly denied. It cannot be said upon the record before us that on defendant’s motion for summary judgment there existed no triable issue of fact with respect to timeliness.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Sharp v. KosmalskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Foreman v. ForemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Scheuer v. ScheuerNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Farano v. StephanelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vanasco v. AngiolelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Marcoux v. MarcouxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Ozkahveci v. OzkahveciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API