Legal Opinion

In the Interest of I. S. H.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 15, 1977No. 76-651PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge.

The appellant-juvenile was adjudicated a delinquent below based upon a finding that he committed a robbery while carrying a weapon. The trial judge, over defense counsel’s objection, permitted the state on cross-examination to impeach the testimony he had offered on his own behalf by demonstrating that he had previously been adjudicated a delinquent.1 This was reversible error.

Pursuant to Section 90.08, Florida Statutes (1975), any witness may be impeached *1296upon a showing of his “conviction of any crime.” Section 39.10(5), Florida Statutes (1975), however,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harris v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. Irvin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. State v. BurrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Interest of M. E. G.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Benedit v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Ware v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API