Legal Opinion
United States v. Amparo Madriz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 24, 1995No. 94-35276Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
51 F.3d 283
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Amparo MADRIZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-35276.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 10, 1995.*
Decided March 24, 1995.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marcus T. Baumann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Martin Allen JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Terry James KohlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Robert S. Egger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Sara Jane MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.