Legal Opinion

Hooten v. Barnard

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1884PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages of the defendant because he built his stable in such a manner that, for want of proper gutters and conductors, the rain water was collected and thrown upon the plaintiff’s land. The defendant set up in his answer, that he had gained by prescription the right to have the water from his stable flow upon the plaintiff’s land.

It appeared, at the trial, that the defendant had maintained his stable, and the roof, gutter, and conductor, in exactly their present condition for more than thirty years, without objection or complaint on the part of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lund v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Leardi v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Harvey v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Swensen v. MarinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Sullivan v. Old Colony Street RailwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Wells v. New Haven & Northampton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API