Legal Opinion
Moyse v. Wagner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 27, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Jacob Wagner appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (McMahon, J.), dated October 17, 2008, as denied his motion for leave to amend his answer to assert a cross claim for indemnification against the defendants Poritz and Associates, LLC, and Alan Poritz.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the contention of the defendant Jacob Wagner, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion for leave to amend his answer to assert a cross claim for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Farragher v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Ortega v. Bisogno & MeyersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Farragher v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Bolanowski v. Trustees of Columbia UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Winters Bros. Recycling Corp. v. H.B. Millwork, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Haberman v. Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010