AHCI, Inc. v. Lamar Advertising of Tennessee, Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
The plaintiffs AHCI, Inc. (AHCI) and Ja-cadeda, Inc. (Jacadeda) appeal from the Court of Appeals’ affirmance of the trial court’s judgment in this action for the recovery of rent. The specific issue for our determination can be stated as follows: whether the lower courts erred in holding that the holdover tenant, Lamar Advertising of Tennessee, Inc., (Lamar) was not bound by the specific rent increases demanded by the landlords AHCI and Jacadeda, but rather was obligated to pay only the fair market value for its occupation of the premises.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Theriot v. P & R FARMS, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Revlon Group Inc. v. LJS Realty, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Russells Factory Stores, Inc. v. Fielden Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brooks v. Networks of Chattanooga, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
- Carolyn M. Stark v. William S. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2023
- Cook's Roofing, Inc. v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020
- Homer L. Jones v. VCPHCS I, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
- James Crowley v. Wendy ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.