Legal Opinion
State v. Hunt
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 4, 1972No. 760PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction of armed robbery. Section 40A-16-2, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 6). The two issues concern: (1) sufficiency of the evidence and (2) line-up testimony.
Sufficiency of the evidence.
Defendant attacks the sufficiency of the evidence. The challenge is to the identification of the defendant as the person who beat and robbed the victim. Although defendant challenged the identification testimony at the close of the State’s case-in-chief, he did not'do so at the close of all the evidence. The question of the sufficiency of the evidence, therefore,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MaesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Elmer Dolan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- State v. StewartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. PhippsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. BrowderNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MottolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. HuntNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972