Legal Opinion
People v. McEntyre
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1938No. Cr. A. 1541PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.
Defendants were charged in two counts of the complaint with violation of section 405 of the Labor Code. Upon a trial by jury, the defendant McEntyre was convicted on each of these counts. He then made a motion for a new trial, which was granted; and thereupon the court of its own motion dismissed these counts, as the statement on appeal declares, “for the sole reason that Section 405 of the Labor Code of the State of California when construed with Section 350b and Section 406 of the same Code was unconstitutional in that said sections, obviously intended as a regulation under the police…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. ChaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- City of Lewiston v. MathewsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Haviland v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.