Jackson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentEldridge, Judge
Because a merger issue under OCGA § 16-1-7 involves the possible imposition of a void sentence which may be reviewed at any time, I must respectfully dissent from Division 4 in Case No. A01A2509.
As held in Kinney v. State, 234 Ga. App. 5, 7 (2) (505 SE2d 553) (1998), one crime is included in another as a matter of fact if it is established by proof of the same or less than all of the facts used to prove the other. OCGA § 16-1-6 (1). A defendant may be tried for both offenses under such circumstances, but may not be convicted of both. OCGA § 16-1-7 (a) (l).26 “This right to be free of multiple…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. EstevezSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Cannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Jarrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.