Legal Opinion

Bonano v. James River Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided October 21, 2020No. 2:19-cv-14764Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JERRI A. BONANO * CIVIL ACTION VERSUS * NO. 19-14764 JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY * SECTION “I” (2) ORDER AND REASONS Non-party Guardian Care, LLC’s Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (ECF No. 24) is pending before me in this matter. Defendant James River Insurance Company filed a timely Opposition Memorandum. ECF No. 31. Having considered the record, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, movant’s motion to quash is DENIED, but the Subpoena Duces Tecum is MODIFIED, for the reasons stated herein. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McLeod Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Fred H. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Merrill v. Waffle House, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
  5. Bozeman v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API