Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Patricia Rom
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 25, 1972No. 72-1084PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Each of the appellants has been subpoenaed to testify on behalf of the Government in the Trial of United States v. Ahmad, Crim. No. 14,950, a case pending in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. On January 7, 1972 the appellants filed in the district court a motion to quash the subpoenas on the ground that the subpoenas and the testimony which would be sought from them in the trial are the-fruit of unlawful electronic surveillance conducted in violation of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. (1971). In response to…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Allen M. Dorfman, (Two Cases). Appeal of David Dorfman Appeal of William E. Webbe. United States of America v. Allen M. DorfmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Thomas Shea v. James Gabriel, United States AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- In the Matter of Zoia HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Socialist Workers Party v. Joseph Grubisic, Appeal of Bernard Carey, DeponentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- In re a Civil Investigative Demand Addressed to Bob Brest Buick, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.