Legal Opinion
MAYNARD Et Al. v. SNAPCHAT, INC.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 5, 2018No. A18A0749PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ray, Judge.
*131 Wentworth and Karen Maynard sued Snapchat, Inc. for negligence and loss of consortium to recover for injuries sustained in a car accident that allegedly resulted from the use of Snapchat's Speed Filter. The Maynards filed this interlocutory appeal from the trial court's grant of Snapchat's motion to dismiss on the grounds that Snapchat is immune to liability under the federal Communications Decency Act ("CDA"), 47 USC § 230 . For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court's order and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.
*132 "In ruling on a motion to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kenneth M. Zeran v. America Online, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- City of Gainesville v. DoddSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Jane Doe No. 1 v. Backpage.Com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Federal Trade Commission v. LeadClick Media, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carly Lemmon v. Snap, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Neff v. McGee.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Suntrust Bank v. BickerstaffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- CITY OF ALPHARETTA v. DEANNA FRANCISCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
- Kathy Richey v. the Kroger CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.