Legal Opinion
Bohannon v. Honda Motor Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 14, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 87-2605-SPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GERALD L. RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate.
Under consideration is Defendant American Honda Motor Co.’s (Honda) Motion to Compel Discovery Responses (doc. 48). Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37, Honda seeks to compel supplemental responses to Interrogatory 16 and Production Requests 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 12 and 17. Plaintiff claimed to be unable to answer Interrogatory 16. He objected to- the production requests as seeking work product or material protected by the collateral-source rule.
Interrogatory 16 asks plaintiff to describe with particularity the alleged defect in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- In Re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation. Petition of the Plaintiffs' Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Pulsecard, Inc. v. Discover Card Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- McCoo v. Denny's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. CatonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Moses v. HalsteadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Kannaday v. BallDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.