State v. South
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Newton Circuit Court. — Hon. J. C. ■ Lamson, Judge. The indictment in this case is sufficient and contains all the necessary averments to inform the defendant of the offense with which he is charged.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Newton Circuit Court. — Hon. J. C. ■ Lamson, Judge. The indictment in this case is sufficient and contains all the necessary averments to inform the defendant of the offense with which he is charged. Section 3526, R. S. 1889; State v. Hecox, 83 Mo. 534; State v. Edwards, 109 Mo. 318. A barn in which is stored divers goods, wares, merchandise, and valuable things is included in the word building as used in section 3526, supra, as much as is a railroad depot (State v. Edwards, supra), or any. other building in which goods, wares and merchandise or other valuable things are kept and…
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
The trial court granted the motion of defendant to quash the following indictment:
“The grand jurors for the state of Missouri, impaneled, sworn and charged to inquire within and for the body of the county of Newton and state aforesaid, upon their oath present and charge that on or about the twelfth day of December, 1895, at the eounty of Newton and state of Missouri, William South did then' and there** unlawfully, feloniously, and burglariously break-into and enter the barn of Jane Joslin, there situate, the same being a building in which divers goods, wares, merchandise, and valuable things…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1806
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte RoquemoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Ex Parte MuckenfussCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- State v. DaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Marshall v. WheelerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.