Legal Opinion
State v. Torgrimson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 2, 2002No. C2-01-905PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant Aaron Timothy Torgrimson challenges the district court’s pretrial evi-dentiary ruling denying his motion to suppress surreptitiously taped statements he made while talking with another suspect in the back seat of a police vehicle. Torgrim-son contends that (1) the surreptitious taping violates his Fourth Amendment rights, and (2) failure to suppress the statements violates Minn.Stat. § 626A.04 (2000). We affirm.
FACTS
On December 3, 2000, State Trooper Wade Erickson was dispatched to investigate a report of an intoxicated driver traveling westbound on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- United States v. Steve McKinnonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- State v. Burgess-BeynonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
- United States v. Matthew WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017