Legal Opinion

Crossland v. Hy-Vee, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided November 7, 2019No. 2:18-cv-04215Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION LISA CROSSLAND, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:18-cv-04215-NKL ) HY-VEE, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant Hy-Vee, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. 35. Hy-Vee brings this motion asserting that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law as to both Plaintiff’s gender discrimination and retaliation claims under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Lake v. Yellow Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Tyler v. University of Arkansas Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API