Legal Opinion

Mair J. Schepps v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 15, 1968No. 24831PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant has been found guilty, in two counts, of violating 26 U.S.C., § 7206(1), wilfully making and subscribing a federal income tax return which he did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter. That the return was false in certain particulars is not disputed. Although not charged with nor being tried for income tax evasion, appellant says that he should have been allowed to introduce proof showing that the falsity resulted in no tax deficiency. This proof was not relevant to the issue raised by the indictment and it was not error to reject it, Siravo v. United…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William C. Siravo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  2. Sam Hoover v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Jerome L. Silverstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Darrel E. SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Solomon GainesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Thalia Kelley Considine, and Charles Ray Considine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Lewis E. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. George F. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API